Investors warned of dangers of jumping on bandwagons

5th June 2014


Investors have been warned of the dangers of jumping on investment bandwagons driven by fairy tales rather than traditional market drivers.

Jan Dehn, head of research at Ashmore says the influence of bandwagons may be understandable given the lack of conventional business cycles and extraordinary monetary measures deployed since 2008/2009.

In a note issued today, he said: “In recent years both markets and sections of the media have fuelled ‘bandwagons’ – where particular stories for some reason grip the market’s attention. Bandwagons quickly become very powerful, resulting in a streamlining of thinking, an over-simplification of complexity and the erasure of nuances, in effect commoditising ideas.”

“They have risen to prominence out of necessity, the mother of all invention. They have become a replacement for structural changes, conventional business cycle dynamics and monetary policy changes both of which have become scarce since 2008/2009.

“Bandwagons are popular both among market makers and the media, because they can be used to persuade a critical mass of investors to move, thereby engaging the enormous volumes of liquidity trapped in financial markets since the onset of QE policies.

“There also appears to be a somewhat cynical exploitation of investor myopia going on: many investors are finding that their economics education and past experiences offer little guidance in today’s unprecedented macroeconomic conditions. This makes them more inclined to believe in fairy tales. Finally, regulatory pressures have undoubtedly helped to concentrate more and more money into narrower and narrower sets of securities, especially developed country bonds and stocks.”

How to build an efficient portfolio using ETFs: Click here to find out more about Mindful Money’s live webcast on Thursday, 12 June.

Dehn says that bandwagons drive trading volumes and market volatility unnecessarily high, increasing revenues for market makers, but offer no value for strategic investors. He suggests they also prey on those with weaker convictions, sucking them into their vortex, while stronger, more independent investors can experience considerable challenges in sticking to their positions, even if they are right.

He adds: “They encourage momentum trading over value investing. Not only is this inefficient, it is also outright dangerous and ultimately fruitless for the majority of participants who end up chasing the market and more often than not buying at the top and selling at the bottom. By discouraging individual thinking, it can create systemic macro risks through the homogenisation of investor behaviour. Emerging Markets (EM) investors are not immune; recent Morningstar data shows that tracking errors for US-based EM local bond market managers have halved since 2009.

Dehn says that what adds a particular sinister twist to the commoditisation of ideas is that it has coincided with the commoditisation of trading.

“Long-gone are the days when markets evaluated individual investments on their merits, that is, analysed investments on a case-by-case basis to determine if the expected returns warranted the money put at risk. Today, most investors pool enormous numbers of individual investments into convenient buckets called asset classes, where they are given weights and benchmarked in indices that are then conveniently labelled as ‘the market’. The commoditisation of trading is risky, because investors tend to lose sight of the risks in the underlying investments. The tools used to alleviate this problem only provide a false sense of security.

He also believes that ratings agencies tend to miss big problems and act late.

“Classification of some securities as ‘risk free’ only ignores the problem of risk, thus increasing the unperceived risk. Finally, the commoditisation of trading means that investors miss out on all those opportunities that are not captured in benchmark indices (this is a particularly big problem in EM, where there are major market failures in index provision).”

“The best way to avoid these pitfalls is to get back to the basics of investing: adopt a value investment approach, maintain a strong credit focus, think independently and follow a medium to long-term investment horizon.”

Four groundless bandwagons

China hard landing: Every time the economic data turns lower in China the market lurches to the conclusion that China’s economy will crash.

Fragile Five: The tendency to confuse cyclical imbalances, such as inflation or current account deficits with intractable structural problems.

Euro-zone breakup: A powerful theme labelled as structural that gripped the market for two years, but which ended abruptly following a simple verbal intervention by ECB President Mario Draghi.

Abenomics: The notion that Japan can fix all its structural problems with a dose of fiscal and monetary stimulus.

Register here for Neil Woodford updates and receive a free research report. 

1 thought on “Investors warned of dangers of jumping on bandwagons”

  1. Noo 2 Economics says:

    A very helpful post, probably because it’s what I’ve been thinking for the last few years, especially around China’s so called hard landing which was first forecast 4 years ago and we’re still waiting! This is like me saying it’s 12:00 noon all day long so I’ve got to be right once a day right!

    I was a subscriber to the EZ break up until last year. The trouble is negative people are negative and positive people are positive. Each is as dangerous as the other.

    Level headed emotionless analysis allied to an acceptance that most of the economics text books I studied in the late 70’s are now irrelevant is what’s required along with a willingness to embrace new paradigms, having completed you own logical research with results that back the new models of course.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *